Yes haha, it really contradicts the principle of queues. But it would be cool if there was such a possibility. However, messages must not be lost 
We do need that property of queues already…
We’ve also experimented with prioritization. If the sender assigns a random priority from 0 to 9, then younger events could pass older events, but then it would be semi-randomized. Additionally, the sender would have to take care of that, which also bloats the code…